Comments for i shot alot

Comment on Duplicate Annihilator by Patrick

Patrick — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:41:21 +0000

Thanks. This is just the review I was looking for. I don't shoot raw, but the idea of possibly deleting images whose only crime was to be taken a few seconds after another shot is too scary. The only way to search by image content is through Google, and this cannot be set to scan your own PC. Yet.

Comment on Duplicate Annihilator by Andy

Andy — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:36:13 +0000

If you would like to keep both the JPEG and RAW versions of a file then run Duplicate Annihilator in Classic Mode using the MD5 checksum. Worked for me anyway.

Comment on Duplicate Annihilator by Maddy

Maddy — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:50:47 +0000

I see your pain. I have 6 aperture libraries containing at least 50,000 images in each and I am positive that 70-80% of these are duplicates. Duplicate annihilator does not detect every duplicate nor does it even scan through my libraries quickly enough. I have no choice but to start the arduous task of manually sorting through my libraries #$!@$!!!

Comment on Duplicate Annihilator by newsfeeding

newsfeeding — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:23:13 +0000

Glad I found this post. Thank you. Manual deletions it is! Bummer.

Comment on Duplicate Annihilator by Aperture help needed - Page 3 - Micro Four Thirds User Forum

Aperture help needed - Page 3 - Micro Four Thirds User Forum — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:59:02 +0000

[...] I just read this post regarding Duplicate Annihilator: Duplicate Annihilator | i shot alot Seems I should've saved my money and just get on with the manual sorting/deleting process… [...]

Comment on Duplicate Annihilator by thejakob

thejakob — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:32:55 +0000

Interesting post. I wish I'd read it before I did what you did and bought the program, since I'm sitting now with the same frustrations. Oh well -manual it is, then…

Comment on Duplicate Annihilator by mike

mike — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:47:15 +0000

Excellent observations and reporting. I appreciate the time you have taken to tell me these things. I'll be waiting for a better Aperture utility.

Comment on Turning the other cheek on Aperture’s Faces by Ron

Ron — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:06:10 +0000

working great for me – 80k images, starting slowly by choosing about 10 people, start with tagging 3 or 4 clear images. now up to a few hundred tags, and it's only made four wrong suggestions.

Comment on Aperture 3 – two months later by george

george — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:45:08 +0000

I'm on the same boat actually Spent ages playing with faces and places. It gets worse… Aperture forgets names I've already tagged

I've actually sent an email to sjobs and perhaps so should you…

just look at this:

Just a couple of google searches: http://www.google.ie/search?q=aperture+places+not…
(About 3,130,000 results)
http://www.google.ie/search?q=aperture+faces+not+…
(About 6,380,000 results)
http://www.google.ie/search?q=aperture+3+problems
(About 10,300,000 results)

Comment on Photography rights in public spaces by mastermesh

mastermesh — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:23:55 +0000

Trademark owner for the above mentioned stereo could potentially sue you as well as the artist himself…